to be categorized aa incomplete. However, thiB distinction between complete and incomplete can be used as a general guide when other statements which might be included under the subcategory of internal unity ore examined. For example, the consciousness of a "3eyond" as described by Pratt®'' and Clork®^ or the awareness of a "Mere" with which one's higher self is coterminous and continuous as discussed by Jemes®? ie not alone sufficient for internal unity without also the loss of sense impressions and pure awarenesa.
Although such phenomena -ere certainly very close to internal unity end cen form a valid part of the complete experience, alone they ere not enough. Similerly the boundaries of the personal self of usual experience may be partially broken down or dissolved within the self without complete loss of all distinctions and the emergence of pure awareness.
Also the kind of loss of sense of self which results in unconsciousness as in sleep or coma is not the same as the paradoxical dissolution of the self in Internal unity. Without the phenomena which includes the essential experience of undifferentiated'
Was this article helpful?