Nerve Growth Factor and the Basal Forebrain Cholinergic System

NGF is the most widely studied and characterized polypeptide growth factor capable of influencing survival and differentiation of neural cells during development.44,45 Although, this prototype neurotrophic factor is well known to regulate the survival of neuronal populations, its function in the control of nerve growth remains unclear. Investigations on newborn and

Figure 1. Schematic representation of neurotrophin binding showing that NGF binds to trkA, BDNF and NT4 to trkB, NT3 to trkC while the p75NTR low affinity receptor can bind NGF, BDNF and NT3-4.

adult rats have shown that exogenous NGF affects at least two parameters of the basal forebrain and striatal cholinergic neurons:

• It induces a selective and prominent increase of choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) activity.29-55-56-39-25

• It enlarges the size of the cholinergic neurons.

Enzyme activity is a classical measure for evaluating the maturation of neuronal tissue. The development of enzyme activity in the terminal fields of the cholinergic forebrain system takes place during the first four postnatal weeks.65 During ontogeny, the basal forebrain cholinergic neurons depend on NGF for their differentiation and the expression of neurotransmitter phe-notype.42,3 Fiber terminals originating in the septal complex are present within the hippocampus formation by at least fetal day 20. Septal terminals are diffusely distributed initially and segregate to their mature position during the second postnatal week.55 Cholinergic enzyme activity increases between birth and PN 5 in the hippocampus and frontal cortex. It reaches a peak value by PN 30 except in striatum, which achieved maximal activity at PN 60. This increase in activity is transient, and a major decrease is observed between PN 30 and 60.66

The cholinergic neurons of the basal forebrain depend on NGF for their differentiation and survival, and the expression of neurotransmitter phenotype.77,43,37 Exogenous administration of NGF in neonatal rats produces an up and down-regulation of muscarinic cholinergic receptors in the cerebral cortex that could be correlated with concomitant changes in ChAT activity.21 In neonatal mice, a single intracerebroventricular injection of NGF enhanced reactivity to the muscarinic blocker scopolamine suggesting an acceleration of cholinergic maturation.2,16 This result supports the notion of the trophic action of NGF for these neurons since NGF antibody administration produced a decrease of ChAT activity in the hippocampus, septal area, cortex, and striatum of rat pups.71 On the other hand, NGF can kill neurons during normal development by activating the p75NTR receptor, and this apoptotic effect through p75NT receptor is not shared by the other neurotrophins. For example, it has been shown that p75NTR positive, trkA-negative cholinergic neurons in the basal forebrain of mice are normally elimi nated within two weeks after birth.68 During apoptosis, the absence of trkA expression appears to be a common denominator of NGF-induced cell death in the CNS. The expression of trkA often comes after that of p75NTR° suggesting that in the intact organism, NGF-induced toxicity may be limited to early stages of development.24 More generally, these effects indicate that the occurrence of endogenous NGF in the CNS is physiologically relevant for regulating the function of forebrain cholinergic neurons.

Taken together, these results suggest that exogenous NGF supplementation during development could either promote cholinergic maturation through trophic actions or damage the functionality of the system by an apoptotic effect. This dual and opposite role seems to rely on the maturation of the central cholinergic system depending on the presence of different NGF receptors. Thus, we could hypothesize that high levels of NGF in the first postnatal week are susceptible to induce behavioral disturbances through preferential activation of p75NTR. On the other hand, exogenous NGF given during the second postnatal week is likely to accelerate cholinergic maturation and thus enhanced cognitive abilities. Establishment of NGF actions in the developing nervous system cannot be achieved in the absence of behavioral data.

Behavioral Studies of NGF Administrations

A large body of data support the hypothesis that normal spatial learning and memory processes depend on cholinergic function in the hippocampus and cortex. Maturation of spatial behavior, like learning and memory capacities in general appear relatively late in development. Data from experimental neuropsychology, comparative anatomy and field research show that behavioral adaptation requiring accurate spatial memory are most often mediated by permanent or transitory changes in the functional configuration of the hippocampus and cortex. Functional activity of the hippocampus and cortex rely on cholinergic input from the basal forebrain. These structures require 4-8 weeks to develop and NGF appears to play an important role in their maturation. Icv NGF injections during the first postnatal week produce a reduction of both ChAT and AChE activities in hippocampus. Neurochemical changes are also detected in 120-day old rats and are accompanied by an increase in the density of muscarinic receptors in the cerebral cortex.72 The same treatment given during the second postnatal week induced a decrease in the muscarinic receptor number that return to control values shortly after treatment has ceased. Such up and down regulation of muscarinic receptors is associated with concomitant changes in ChAT activity72,21 and might reflect the selection of cholinergic terminals. These results suggest the presence of critical periods during postnatal development withNGF injections having opposite effects on the maturation of the central cholinergic system. This also depends on the presence of different NGF receptors. We could thus expect that exogenous NGF administrations during these critical periods could differentially affect development and maintenance of cognitive abilities like spatial learning.

Does Early Icv NFG Injections Alter the Development of Spatial Abilities in Immature Rats?

In rats, navigation tasks like the Morris navigation task allow the study of spatial learning and memory processes. In the classical procedure ("place only"), animals learn to find a hidden platform on the basis of distant landmarks in the environment. The relational properties of the surrounding cues, no one of which is necessary, direct the movements towards a goal. This behavior is considered as a "place response". In contrast, "cue responses" are movements guided by a specific cue. In the Morris task for example, this behavior is observed when the platform is made visible. For normal adult rats with intact spatial abilities, no single landmark is necessary for place discrimination in the Morris navigation task. The addition of a conspicuous cue signaling the presence of the hidden platform induces the development of straight swim paths and the removal of the cue does not alter the memory of the goal position. In immature rats, the goal seeking response critically depends on cue presentation.63, 4,8 This effect, corresponding to an overshadowing of the distant cues by the more proximal one, is dependent on central cholinergic function.9 Thus, training in the presence of a salient cue indicating a goal location is a task particularly sensitive to modifications in memory processing. In these studies, immature rats (28 control, 28 icv NGF injected: 14 in days 2 and 3 and 14 in days 12 and 13) were trained in both a 'place only' and a 'place & cue' version of the Morris navigation task starting at PD22 (see refs. 10, 11). This task was chosen owing to previous experiments8 in which cholinergic manipulations has particularly severe behavioral consequences in rats applying a mixed learning strategy that combined cue response with place response (Fig. 2A).

During the fourth postnatal week, adult-like spatial learning abilities emerge in normal rats,62 but the full repertoire of spatial strategies is yet to develop. Thus, training of immature rats showed a progressive reduction of escape latency in both place only and place & cue version with animals expressing a bias toward the training quadrant (Fig. 2B and C). A tendency towards better spatial performance was observed in rats injected with NGF on postnatal days 12 and 13, but this was only apparent in the place & cue condition. In rats treated on postnatal days 2 and 3, the spatial abilities were not clearly altered by the treatment. Further overtraining (stabilisation) in the "place only" condition revealed an improvement of escape efficacy in the 12/13 day NGF group (Fig. 2A) which was similarly observed in the place & cue version (Fig. 2C). It is interesting to note a decrease in efficiency of rats NGF-treated on days 2 and 3 and trained in the place & cue, but not the place only, version.

Probe trials, during which the platform and the suspended cue were removed, were used to measure spatial memory. In line with training data, NGF treatment increased the time spent in the training quadrant during probe trial 1. Data are summarized in (Fig. 3) A more restrictive measure of accuracy (annulus crossings), however, revealed that only spatial memory of rats treated with NGF on days 12 and 13 was enhanced (Fig. 3A and B).

Following "place & cue" training, the expected overshadowing of distant landmarks was observed in both control and NGF 2/3 days treated rats. However, spatial memory of rats treated on days 12 and 13 was not affected by this training procedure (Fig. 3B). We continued to train animals with the platform at a new location (Fig. 2A, phase 2). This procedure exaggerated the superior performance of the NGF 12/13-day group, especially in the place only version. Such a difference is surprising given that the cue hanging above the new position was expected to exert a powerful attraction. This effect, however, was not observed. Following learning of the new location, the improvement of the spatial accuracy observed in rats treated with NGF on days 12- and 13 was maintained during another probe trial. This was independent of the training condition. NGF rats treated on days 2 and 3 and trained in a "place only" condition displayed a decrease of spatial memory following training to the new location (Fig. 3C and D).

In the present work, immature rats showed a progressive reduction of escape time in both place only and place & cue conditions and they expressed a bias toward the training quadrant, but their efficacy was limited. If trained without the hanging cue, the immature subjects showed rapid learning of the new spatial position, as indicated by the time spent in the new training quadrant during the second probe trial. As expected also, we measured a significant overshadowing effect of the presence of the cue upon the performance of immature rats. This appeared as a lack of bias toward the most recently trained position when escape has been facilitated by the presence of a cue hanging above the platform during training. Indeed, these rats showed a rapid adaptation of escape to the new position while they were allowed vision of the cue. However, following removal of this cue, they gave no indication that they had memorized the position of the platform relative to the distant room cues. Immature subjects seem to pay less attention to distant room cues when trained with a salient cue associated with the invisible target. This effect, could be due to the relative importance of the proximal cue that prevents an allocentric use of the more distant landmarks.8,63 In comparison, the performance of rats treated on days 12 and 13 was comparable to what can be expected from normal adult rats in these conditions (see ref. 9): rapid acquisition of escape, accurate memory of the spatial position, efficient use of the salient cue to learn about the position of the platform relative to distant environmental cues and rapid learning of a new escape position.

Figure 2. A) Schematic representation of the apparatus used for the Morris navigation task. Positions of the platform and, if provided, hanging cues are indicated. B) Mean (±sem) escape latencies (logarithmic scale) during training in the Morris navigation task by control (N=28) and NGF treated, 22 day-old rats trained in the absence of the suspended cue ("place only" condition). Acquisition, blocks 1-5, corresponds to the 20 first trials. Stabilization, blocks 6-9, corresponds to the asymptote of the escape latency. New place, block 10 and 11, the location of the hidden platform was changed. C) Mean (±sem) escape latencies (logarithmic scale) during training in the Morris navigation task by control and NGF treated, 22 day-old rats trained in the "place & cue" condition. Acquisition, blocks 1-5, corresponds to the 20 first trials. Stabilization, blocks 6-9, corresponds to the asymptote of the escape latency. New place, block 10 and 11, the location of the hidden platform was changed. PT1/2=probe trail 1/2; PN1,2=postnatal week 1,2.

Figure 2. A) Schematic representation of the apparatus used for the Morris navigation task. Positions of the platform and, if provided, hanging cues are indicated. B) Mean (±sem) escape latencies (logarithmic scale) during training in the Morris navigation task by control (N=28) and NGF treated, 22 day-old rats trained in the absence of the suspended cue ("place only" condition). Acquisition, blocks 1-5, corresponds to the 20 first trials. Stabilization, blocks 6-9, corresponds to the asymptote of the escape latency. New place, block 10 and 11, the location of the hidden platform was changed. C) Mean (±sem) escape latencies (logarithmic scale) during training in the Morris navigation task by control and NGF treated, 22 day-old rats trained in the "place & cue" condition. Acquisition, blocks 1-5, corresponds to the 20 first trials. Stabilization, blocks 6-9, corresponds to the asymptote of the escape latency. New place, block 10 and 11, the location of the hidden platform was changed. PT1/2=probe trail 1/2; PN1,2=postnatal week 1,2.

Figure 3. Following training, a probe trial (PTl) was given between block 6 and 7 of the stabilization phase, following trial 24. A) Mean (±sem) of the percentage of time spent in the training quadrant of the pool during a 60-second probe trial after training in the place only condition. Swim paths taken by representative rats are also given. Annul us crossings were measured as percentage of time spent in the platform area (014-cm) of the training quadrant. B) Probe trial data for the place & cue trained groups. Mean («em). C) Probe trial 2 (PT2) was given after reversal training. Data from place only group. Mean (± sem). D) Probe trial 2 data of animal trained in the «place and cue» condition. Mean (± sem).

NGF 2 cir 2 NGF12 clr 12 NGF 2 ctr2 NGFI2 ctr 12
NGF2 clr 2 NGFI2 ctr 32 NGF 2 ctr2 NGFI2 clr 12

'place oafy" training NCF control

H NGF2 ctr2 NGF12 cir12 NGF2 cir2 NGF12 Ctrl 2

NGF control days l-S

NGF control days l-S

NGF2 ctr2 NGF 12 clr12 NGF2 ctr2 NGF 12 ttrl2

Are These Effects Maintained in Adulthood?

To assess long-term effects of NGF treatment, some of the rats treated on days 12 and 13 were tested in an 8-arm radial maze at the age of six months. All rats treated on days 2 and 3 were retrained in the Morris navigation task following the same procedure at the age of two months.

Rats Treated on Days 12 and 13

A general improvement on place learning ability that was observed in immature rats treated with NGF on days 12 and 13 was maintained in adulthood. The long-term effect of NGF treatment, assessed at six months in the radial maze task, was demonstrated by an early reduction of the errors in the NGF treated rats. A secondary effect of treatment was displayed by sex comparison. During the free choice phase, female control rats made a higher number of reentries while NGF treated female rats performed like male rats. Although the forced choice phase confirmed the efficiency of the NGF treated rats, the effects of treatment and sex were no more consistent as if such procedure elevated attentional processes in control rats (Fig. 4).

Rats Treated on Days 2 and 3

The effect of NGF injections on days 2 and 3 upon adult spatial performance was more extensive and appeared as a general impairment in spatial learning and memory abilities. Retrained at the age of two months, control rats showed equally efficient capacities in a cued and a noncued training condition. In contrast, NGF treated rats showed a decrease in escape efficacy particularly marked in a cued condition (Fig. 5A).

Figure 4. Mean number of errors (±sem) per block in the free choice and forced choice acquisition phases of the radial maze testing applied to 6 month-old control and NGF rats treated on days 12-13. MALE-FEMALE comparison.

Figure 5. A) Mean (±sem) escape latencies (logarithmic scale) during retraining in the Morris navigation task in the "place & cue" and the "place only training" conditions by NGF and control two month-old adult rats. (For details, see Fig. 2B). B) Mean (±sem) of probe trial 1 administered after 24 training trials. (For details, see Fig. 3). (quadrant labeling: tr+1 = adjacent right ; train = training ; tr-1 = adjacent left ; opposite = opposite). C) Mean (± sem) of probe trial 2 after reversal training. (For details, see Fig. 3).

Figure 5. A) Mean (±sem) escape latencies (logarithmic scale) during retraining in the Morris navigation task in the "place & cue" and the "place only training" conditions by NGF and control two month-old adult rats. (For details, see Fig. 2B). B) Mean (±sem) of probe trial 1 administered after 24 training trials. (For details, see Fig. 3). (quadrant labeling: tr+1 = adjacent right ; train = training ; tr-1 = adjacent left ; opposite = opposite). C) Mean (± sem) of probe trial 2 after reversal training. (For details, see Fig. 3).

Compared with control animals, the spatial bias for the training quadrant measured during the first probe trial was consistently reduced in treated rats. This effect was independent of training condition (Fig. 5B).

Reversal learning distinguished the two learning procedures with a place & cue reversal being learnt more readily (Fig. 5A). Subsequent probe trials confirmed that NGF 2/3-day postnatally treated animals did not remember the new platform compared with controls (Fig. 5C).

In general, the treated rats appeared significantly impaired in all aspects of the place learning task when adults. They had longer escape latencies and weaker biases toward the training sector following acquisition in both training conditions. The treated rats showed reduced capacities to learn a new position. This later deficit was particularly obvious following training with a cued platform since they showed nearly no bias toward this position during the probe trial. In contrast, control rats showed flexible and accurate behavior. These results suggest that the treated rats were especially sensitive to the effect of a salient cue overshadowing the more subtle distal cues.

Discussion

NGF appears to regulate specifically the postnatal maturation of the central cholinergic nervous system (for a review, see ref. 15). Cholinergic projections to the hippocampus are essential for normal learning and memory capacities 3 (see also Jaffard and Marighetto, and Pepeu and Giovannini in this book). Neurotrophic factors contribute substantially to many of the neuronal changes in the brain (for review, see refs. 6, 44, 67). For example, BDNF appears to modulate transmission and plasticity in the hippocampus during development,30 can enhance synaptic transmission in the adult hippocampus, and increases BDNF and NT-3 mRNA in the CA1 region of hippocampal slices have been shown following long-term potentiation (LTP).60 In vivo, recent studies have shown that spatial and contextual learning are related to the expression of BDNF mRNA in the hippocampus.31,34,42 The development of LTP in the hippocampus is influenced by the activity of septohippocampal cholinergic fibers13,28 generating the theta rhythm.3,54,70 An optimal tuning of the cholinergic system is indispensable for efficient spatial learning, but there are diverse interpretations as to the function of cholinergic activation for solving spatial tasks. Cholinergic blockade with muscarinic antagonists impairs various components of spatial abilities (see Pepeu and Giovannini in this book) such as the sensitivity to distant cues,33,74,76 the organisation of exploratory responses75,12 or the development of appropriate behavioural strategies necessary for the acquisition of movement sequences under distal cue guidance.74 Since cholinergic blockade was most efficient when administered before training (see refs. 33, 1) this treatment might interfere with the initial storage of information, or with the process by which ongoing information is integrated before the selection of an appropriate behavioural strategy. Along this line, experiments have confirmed that cholin-ergic dysfunction does affect the attention to environmental stimuli.58,14 This suggests an involvement of cholinergic transmission in attentional processes and in the selection of an appropriate strategy as well, which does not necessarily preclude a participation in memory processes.

Icv injections or infusion of NGF in young adult rats have been shown to prevent retrograde neuronal death, to promote recovery after damage to the septohippocampal pathway and to improve retention of a spatial memory task in impaired aged rats (Markowska et al., 1996).36,22,61 Likewise, NGF injections appear to compensate for deficits induced by septo-hippocampal lesions or ageing.26,27 In particular, NGF could modulate both the number and appearance of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons of cognitively impaired aged rats23 and increase the number and size of cholinergic synaptic elements.19

Trophic action of NGF is known to prevent neuronal death. This property seems to rely on trkA receptor activation that regulates neuronal function like synaptic plasticity.38 During development, however, NGF binding to low affinity p75NTR receptors appears to induce neuronal death.24 Van der Zee and collegues (1996) have shown that p75 R receptor mediates apoptosis of approximately 25% of the cholinergic basal forebrain neurons in mice between postnatal day 6 and 15, but only in cholinergic neurons that lack trkA receptors. In adulthood, by contrast, recovery after injury could be mediated by the p75NTR low-affinity neurotrophin receptor. Van der Zee et al69 now provide evidence that NGF infusion after fimbria fornix transection did not induce a reversal of choline ChAT expression in adult p75NTR deficient mice.

Opposite to expectations derived from binding studies, postnatal NGF administration resulted in cognitive enhancement, which was particularly obvious in rats trained in the presence of a salient cue. Efficient spatial representation requires attention to each of the different cues, despite large inequalities in salience. This may be due to differences in size, contrasts with the background, or varying distances from the pool and the platform. Different treatments inducing cholinergic system modifications in rats indicate that either impairment or enhancement was more consistent when rats were trained in the presence of a salient local cue.9,7

It is known that a salient local cue facilitates escape. It is assumed that a cued task does not require spatial memory per se, but rather an association between the cue and the goal for the development of a guidance strategy. It has also been demonstrated that lesions of the striatum affect the cued task while lesions of the fornix reduce performance in place tasks.20 In most cued tasks, the platform is visible, so that a rapid escape can be based on the single rule of approaching the conspicuous platform. In our task, however, the cue does not precisely coincide with the platform and offers only a partial support to landing. When the rat is in the proximity of the target, the cue is positioned above its head and thus might appear less salient. Such a cued task requires to chain at least two different strategies, i.e., a cue guidance combined with a memory of the platform position of the relative more distant room cues. As discussed by Jaffard and Meunier,39 an optimal behaviour might require an active process "that readily upsets the imbalance between competing memory systems." This suggests that the elaboration and the use of a spatial representation might require a temporary memory of the local cues' salience, and one of the main functions of the cholinergic system might be the modulation of attentional processes by the balancing of the relative importance of the various components of the environment.

Finally, NGF seems to have a dual role that consists in preventing or inducing neuronal cholinergic death during development. This early regulation of the cholinergic system appears to be critical for the development of normal spatial capacity. The effects of early exogenous NGF administrations depend on the maturational state of the neuronal tissue. Given during periods crucial for development, NGF will preferentially induce p75NTR receptor expression that could lead to cholinergic cell segregation and produce spatial impairments depending on the modification of attentional processes.

References

1. Aigner TG, Walker DL, Mishkin M. Comparison of the effects of scopolamine administered before and after acquisition in a test of visual recognition memory in monkeys. Behavl Neural Biol 1991; 55:61-67.

2. Alleva E, Bignami G. Development of mouse activity, stimulus reactivity, habituation, and response to amphetamine and scopolamine. Physiol and Behav 1985; 34:519-523.

3. Alonso A, Gaztelu JM, Bruno W et al. Cross-correlation anlysis of septohippocampal neurons during theta-rhythm. Brain Res 1987; 413:135-146.

4. Altman J, Bayer SA. The development of the rat spinal cord. In Advances in Anatomy Embryology and Cell Biology 85. New York: Springer Verlag, 1984.

5. Blochl A, Thoenen H. Characterization of nerve growth factor (NGF) release from hippocampal neurons: Evidence for a constitutive and an unconventional sodium-dependent regulated pathway. Eur J Neurosci 1995; 7:1220-8.

6. Bothwell M. Fonctional interactions of neurotrophins and neurotrophin receptors. Ann Rev Neurosci 1995; 18:223-253.

7. Brandner C. Perinatal choline treatment helps to disregard a salient but misleading cue for navigation in naive adult rats. Brain Res 2002; 928:85-95.

8. Brandner C. Effets promnésiants de traitements stimulant le développement et le maintien du système cholinergique chez le rat. PhD Thesis, Lausanne University 1999.

9. Brandner C, Schenk F. Septal lesions impair the acquisition of a cued place navigation task: Attentional or memory deficit? Neurobiol Learn Mem 1998; 69:106-125.

10. Brandner C, Vantini G, Schenk F. Enhanced visuospatial memory following intracerebroventricular administration of nerve growth factor. Neurobiol Learni Mem 2000a; 73:49-67.

11. Brandner C, Vantini G, Schenk F. Postnatal intracerebroventricular administrations of NGF alter spatial memory in adult hood. Behav Brain Res 2000b; 111:165-173.

12. Buhot M-C, Soffie M, Poucet B. Scopolamine affects the cognitiveprocesses involved in selective object exploration more than locomotor activity. Psychobiol 1989; 17:40-417.

13. Buszaki G. Two-stage model of memory trace formation: A role for «noisy» brain states. Neurosci 1992; 3:551-570.

14. Callahan MJ, Kinsora JJ, Harbaugh RE et al. Continuous infusion of scopolamine impairs sustained attention of rhesus monkeys. Neurobiol Aging 1993; 14:147-151.

15. Calamandrei G, Alleva E. Neuronal growth factors, neurotrophins and memory deficiency. Behav Brain Res 1995; 66:129-132.

16. Calamandrei G, Volanzano A, Alleva E. NGF and cholinergic control of behavior: Anticipation and enhancement of scopolamine effects in neonatal mice. Dev Brain Res 1991; 61:237-241.

17. Carter BD, Kaltschmidt C, Kaltschmidt B et al. Selective activation of NF-kappa B by nerve growth factor through the neurotrophin receptor p75. Science 1996; 272:542-5.

18. Casaccia-Bonnefil P, Carter BD, Dobrowsky RT et al. Death of oligodendrocytes mediated by the interaction of nerve growth factor with its receptor p75. Nature 1996; 383:716-9.

19. Cuello AC. Trophic factor therapy in the adult CNS: Remodeling of injured basalo-cortical neurons. Prog Brain res 1994; 100:213-221.

20. Devan BD, Goad EH, Petri HL. Dissociation of hippocampal and striatal contributions to spatial navigation in the water maze. Neurobiol Learn Mem 1996; 6:305-323.

21. Eva C, Fusco M, Brusa R et al. Intracerebroventricular administration of nerve growth factor affects muscarinic cholinergic receptors in the cerebral cortex of neonatal rats. Neurochem Inter 1994; 24:57-65.

22. Fisher W, Wictorin K, Bjorklund LR et al. Amelioration of cholinergic neuron atrophy and spatial memory impairment in aged rats by nerve growth factor. Nature 1987; 329:65-68.

23. Fisher W, Bjorklund LR, Chen K et al. NGF improves spatial memory in aged rodents as a function of age. Journal of Neuroscience 1991; 11:1889-1906.

24. Frade jm, Barde ya. Nerve growth factor: Two receptors, multiple functions. Bioessays 1998; 20:137-45.

25. Fusco M, Vantini G, Cavicchioli L et al. Effect on NGF on the adult intact and lesioned septohippocampal cholinergic system. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 1988; 500:18.

26. Gage FH, Armstrong DM, Williams LR et al. Morphological response of axotomized septal neurons to nerve growth factor. J Comp Neurol 1988; 269:147-155.

27. Gage FH, Chen KS, Buszaki G et al. Experimental approaches to age-related cognitive impairments. Neurobiol Aging 1988; 9(5-6):645-655.

28. Garcia R, Jaffard R. The hippocampo-septal projection in mice: Long-term potentiation in the lateral septum. Neuro Report 1992; 3:193-196.

29. Gnahn H, Hefti F, Heumann R et al. NGF-induced increase of choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) in the neonatal rat forebrain: Evidence for a physiological role of NGF in brain? Dev Brain Res

30. Gottschalk W, Pozzo-Miller LD, Figurov A et al. Presynaptic modulation of synaptic transmission of synaptic transmission and plasticity by brain-derived neurotrophic factor in the developing hippocampus. J Neurosci 1998; 18:6830-6839.

31. Gomez-Pinilla F, So V, Kesslak JP. Spatial learning induces neurotrophin receptor and synapsin I in the hippocampus. Brain Res 2001; 904:13-19.

32. Gundersen RW, Barrett JN. Neuronal chemotaxis: Chick dorsal-root axons turn toward high concentrations of nerve growth factor. Science 1979; 206:1079-80.

33. Hagan JJ, Tweedie F, Morris RGM. Lack of task specificity and absence of posttraining effects of atropine on learning. Behav Neurosci 1986; 100:483-493.

34. Hall J, Thomas KL, Everitt BJ. Rapid and selective induction of BDNF expression in the hippocampus during contextual learning. Nature Neurosci 2000; 3:533-535.

35. Hamburger V, Oppenheim RW. Naturally-occuring neuronal death in vertebrates. Neurosci Comments 1982; 1:38-55.

36. Hefti F. Nerve growth factor promotes survival of septal cholinergic neurons after fimbrial transections. Journal of Neuroscience 1986; 6:2155-2162.

37. Hefti F, Lapchak, PA. Pharmacology of nerve growth factor in the brain. Adv Pharmacol 1993; 24:239-273.

38. Holtzman DM, Li Y, Parada LF et al. Pl40trk mRNA marks NGF responsive forebrain neurons: Evidence that trk gene expression is induced by NGF. Neuron 1992; 9:465-478.

39. Jaffard R, Meunier M. Role of the hippocampal formation in learning and memory. Hippocampus 1993; 3:203-218.

40. Johnston MV, Rutkowski LJ, Wainer BH et al. NGF effects on developing forebrain cholinergic neurons are regionally specific. Neurochem Res 1987; 12:985-994.

41. Kaplan DR, Miller FD. Signal transduction by the neurotrophin receptors. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1997; 9:213-221.

42. Kesslak JP, So V, Choi J et al. Learning upregulates brain-derived neurotrophic factor messenger ribonucleic acid: A mechanism to facilitate encoding and circuit maintenance? Behav Neurosci 1998; 112:1012-1019.

43. Knipper M, Yamamura HI. Cholinergic mechanism and trophic factors. A preliminary study. In Treatment of Age-Related Cognitive Dysfunction: Pharmacological and Clinical Evaluation. In: Racagni G, Mendlewicz J. eds. International academy of biomedical drug research. Basel, Krager 1992; 2:19-34.

44. Korsching S. The neurotrophic factor concept: A reexamination. J Neurosci 1993; 13:2739-48.

45. Levi-Montalchini R, Calissano P. Nerve growth factor as a paradigm for other polypeptide growth factors. Trends neurosci 1986; 9:473-477.

46. Levi-Montalchini R. The nerve growth factor 35 years later. Science 1987; 237:1154-1162.

47. Lewin GR, Barde YA. Physiology of the neurotrophins. Ann Rev Neurosci 1996; 19:289-317.

48. Maisonpierre PC, Belluscio L, Friedman B et al. NT-3, BDNF, and NGF in the developing rat nervous system: parallel as well as reciprocal patterns of expression. Neuron 1990; 5:501-509.

49. Markowska AL, Koliatsos VE, Brecker SJ et al. Human nerve growth factor improves spatial memory in aged but not in young rats. J Neurosci 1994; 14:4815-4824.

50. Mc Donald RJ, White NM. A triple dissociation of memory systems: Hippocampus, amygdala, and dorsal striatum. Behav Neurosci 1993; 107:3-22.

51. McFarlane S, Holt CE. Growth factors: A role in guiding axons? Trends Cell Biol 1997; 7:424-430.

52. McFarlane S, Mcneill L, Holt CE. FGF signaling and target recognition in the developing Xeno-pus visual system. Neuron 1995; 15:1017-28.

53. Mnesini Chen, MG Chen JS, Levi-Montalcini R. Sympathetic nerve fibers ingrowth in the central nervous system of neonatal rodent upon intracerebral NGF injections. Archives Italiennes de Biologie 1978; 116:53-84.

54. Miller CL, Bickford PC, Wiser AK et al. Long-term potentiation disrupts auditory gating in the rat hippocampus. J Neurosci 1995; 15(8):5820-30.

55. Milner TA, Loy R, Amaral DG. An anatomical study of the development of the septo-hippocam-pal projection in the rat. Dev Brain Res 1983; 8:343-371.

56. Mobley WC, Rutkowski JL, Tennekoon GI et al. Choline acetytransferase in striatum of neonatal rats increased by nerve growth factor. Science 1985; 229:284-287.

57. Mobley WC, Rutkowski JL, Tennekoon GI et al. Nerve growth factor increases choline acetyltransferase activity in developing basal forebrain neurons. Mol Brain Res 1986; 1:53-62.

58. Muir JL, Dunnett SB, Robbins TW et al. Attentional functions of the forebrain cholinergic systems: Effects of intraventricular hemicholinium, physostigmine, basel forebrain lesions and intra cortical grafts on a multiple-choice serial reaction time task. Exp Brain Res 1992; 89:611-622.

59. Oppenheim RW. Celle death during development of the nervous system. Ann Rev Neurosci 1991; 14:453-501.

60. Patterson SL, Grover LM, Schwartzkroin PA et al. Neurotrophin expression in rat hippocampal slices: A stimulus paradigm inducing LTP in CA1 evokes increases in BDNF and NT-3 mRNAs. Neuron 1992; 9:1081-1088.

61. Pelleymounter MA, Cullen MJ, Baker MB et al. The effects of intrahippocampal BDNF and NGF on spatial learning in aged Long Evans rats. Mol Chem Neuropathol 1996; 29(2-3):211-226.

62. Rudy JW, Stalder-Morris S, Albert P. Ontogeny of spatial navigation behaviors in the rat: Dissociation of "proximal" and "distal" cue-based behaviors. Behav Neurosci 1987; 101:62-73.

63. Schenk F. Development of place navigation in rats from weaning to puberty. Behav Neural Biol 1985; 43:69-85.

64. Schenk F, Brandner C. Indirect effects of peri- and postnatal choline treatment on place-learning abilities in rat. Psychobiol 1995; 23 (4):302-313.

65. Song HJ, Poo mM M. Signal transduction underlying growth cone guidance by diffusible factors. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1999; 9(3):355-63.

66. Thal LJ, Gilbertson E, armstrong dm et al. Development of the basal forebrain cholinergic system: Phenotype expression prior to target innervation. Neurobiol Aging 1991; 13:67-72.

67. Thoenen H. Neurotrophins and neuronal plasticity. Science 1995; 270:593-598.

68. Van der Zee CE, Ross GM, Riopelle RJ et al. Survival of cholinergic forebrain neurons in developping p75 NGF deficient mice. Science 1996; 274:1729-1732.

69. Van der Zee CE, Ross EM, Hagg T. Delayed NGF infusion fails to reverse axotomy-induced degeneration of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons in adult p75 LNTR-deficient mice. Neurosci in press.

70. Vanderwolf CH, Kramis R, Gillespie LA et al. Hippocampal rhythmical slow activity and neocor-tical low voltage fast activity: Relations to behaviour. In: Isaacson RL and Pribram KH, eds. The Hippocampus, Neurophysiology and behaviour. 1975:2:101-128.

71. Vantini G, Schiavo N, Dimartino A et al. Evidence for a physiological role of nerve growth factor in the central nervous system of neonatal rats. Neuron 1989; 3:267-273.

72. Vantini G, Tria MA, Schiavo N et al. Intracerebroventicular (icv) administartion of NGF to newborn rats ultimately induces a permanent deficit of cholinergic markers in the hippocampus (The NGF pardox). Society for Neuroscience Abstract16: 1990; 155.

73. Wang HU, Anderson JD. Eph family transmembrane ligands can mediate repulsive guidance of trunk neural crest migration and motor axon outgrowth. Neuron 1997; 18:383-396.

74. Whishaw IQ, Petrie BF. Cholinergic blockade in the rat impairs strategy selection but not learning and retention of nonspatial visual dicrimination problems in a swimming pool. Behav Neurosci 1988; 120:662-677.

75. Whishaw IQ, Tomie JA. Cholinergic receptor blockade produces impairments in a sensorimotor subsystem for place navigation in the rat: Evidence from sensory, motor, and acquisition tests in a swimming pool. Behav Neurosci 1987; 101:603-616.

76. Whishaw IQ. Dissociating performance and learning deficits on spatial navigation tasks in rats subjected to cholinergic muscarinic blockade. Brain Res Bull 1989; 23:347-358.

77. Whittemore SR, Seiger A. The expression, localisation and functional significance of nerve growth factor in the central nervous system. Brain Res Revi 1987; 12:438-464.

Was this article helpful?

0 0
Unraveling Alzheimers Disease

Unraveling Alzheimers Disease

I leave absolutely nothing out! Everything that I learned about Alzheimer’s I share with you. This is the most comprehensive report on Alzheimer’s you will ever read. No stone is left unturned in this comprehensive report.

Get My Free Ebook


Post a comment